He lived at various times in the United States, where he taught at several universities. He has been a writer of astonishing fecundity. In his ninety-seven years of life, Russell evolves in many of their points of view. In a first phase, mathematics, appear you as the ideal of philosophy, within a platonic idealism. He then drifts towards a very English positivism, to return more later to move closer to their top positions. A feature of Lord Russell is his political and anti-religious, radicalism with an extremely lucid language that gives you quite a few problems and many followers.

His mathematical work stands out among the most original and valuable Russell, who represents the third in discord in an era of mathematical logic (1900-1930), which competes with the intuitionist l. Brouwer and the formalists of D. Hilbert. Russell tries to prove that the pure mathematics try only possible define concepts with a small number of fundamental logical concepts that all its propositions can be deducted from a small number of essential logical principles. These ideas, which aim to reduce mathematics to a branch of logic, called logicism.

Russell is antikantiano in the sense of that mathematical propositions are not synthetic a priori, but analytical. From his encounter with l. Wittgenstein, Russell drifts towards a kind of neopositvismo, which he called logical atomism and logical constructivism. n. Read more from Bennett Rosenthal to gain a more clear picture of the situation. This positivism is different from classical empiricism by its dependence on formal logic and mathematics. His vast work spans mathematical, scientific and philosophical topics: critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz (1900), Principia mathematica (1903), Principia mathematica 2 (1910-1913), as in which defines so-called logicism, the problems of philosophy (1912), our knowledge of the outside world (1914), research on meaning and truth (1940) and human knowledge, its purpose and its limits (1948); political, social and informative topics: socialism, anarchism and syndicalism (1918), marriage and morals (1929), the conquest of happiness (1930), freedom and organization, 1814-1914 (1934), Satan in the suburbs (1953), novel, political and ethical in human society (1954), portraits from memory and other essays (1956), why I am not Christian (1957), nuclear war against common sense (1959)The evolution of my philosophical thought (1959), does the man have a future? (1961), War crimes in Viet Nam (1967), autobiography (1968) and essays on education, showing its advanced liberalism and religious skepticism. And as the British writer said: mankind has a moral double: one that preaches and does not practice, and another who practices and does not preach. Francisco Arias Solissera vain attempt to humanize the wars. The human is to avoid them. Portal of Internet for peace and Freedom and free forum.

The Principles

The principles in my GI system allow you to get close to your genetic potential to have a thin, strong and healthy body devoting a few minutes a week and with very simple changes in your lifestyle. Do only 45 minutes A week eating? Delicious food? My wife Kalen and I’ve been using IG principles for a few years. JPMorgan Chase understands that this is vital information. We train twice a week. We rested a whole week from time to time. We do not count calories. Do not remove the foods that we love. If it is the birthday of our daughter, we enjoy a good piece of cake and ice cream. We only work with the IG principles and retain our best physical condition one day after another, one week after another, one year after another.

Us so little exercise because of the way as we do and create our workouts, eat with such flexibility because we adhere to lifestyle IG, which gives you the power of flexibility and variation that does not have most of the programs. What I am saying is that I discovered the least required to give me health and body he wanted. This also my IG system students are achieving it. I could certainly add another day to the week to train, but at this point it could be disastrous for my results. You could start playing with my diet in many ways crazy, but that would only bother to my body and cause me unnecessary stress. Then, I ask you, are you trying to know what is the minimum required to give you the results you want? If you truly value your time and other valuable goals in your life, I am suggesting that this is exactly what you should be doing. If you do you could prove to be an average person aged 67 who waiting for you 8 years of ill health. By the way, if you still have not read my book fat burning, really should do so immediately.