science

The law shall specify the functions that the President of the Republic may delegate to the ministers, directors of administrative departments, legal representatives of decentralized entities, superintendents, governors, mayors and state agencies that the law determines. Also, determine the conditions under which the administrative authorities may delegate to his subordinates or other officials. The delegation disclaims delegating responsibility, which rests solely with the delegatee, whose actions or decisions can always amend or revoke one, resuming the consequent responsibility. The law establishes the resources that are available against acts of the proxies.

The President of the Republic, signed by all ministers, may declare a state of foreign war. Upon such a declaration, the Government shall have the powers strictly necessary to repel the aggression, defend the sovereignty, meet the requirements of the war and to reestablish normal. The declaration of state of foreign war will only proceed once the Senate has approved the declaration of war, in the opinion of the President is necessary to repel the aggression. As long as the state of war, Congress will meet their full constitutional and legal powers, and the Government will inform you regularly on reasoned that issued decrees and developments. Legislative decrees issued by the government suspending the laws incompatible with the state of war, apply for as long as they have brought and shall not be declared effective as soon restored to normal. The Congress may at any time, amend or repeal by the affirmative vote of two thirds of the members of both camera.

When we say that something is scientific, we tend to imply that it is authentic, clear and secure. Therefore, all want their area to be treated as scientific knowledge. Other fields of study are classified as pseudo-ciencientificos or false science, whose practitioners describe their scientific activities and even use the language of science. But how can we separate the scientific from what is not? No easy task. Define the boundaries of science would be a job without exito1.

The frontier between the science of pseudo-science is defined by the demarcation criterion used. This has been discussed by many scientists and philosophers of science of the twentieth century. Kant stated that the trials are all science must be synthetic a priori. Synthetic because they have to be extensive, ie, our knowledge of science is to be extended. And a priori because their truth can not rely on the experience, which is particular and not universal in this way are also needed.

This is an example of a criterion of demarcation. As such deprive others of being called scientific knowledge. Another criterion of demarcation would be that established the Circle of Vienna: scientist only what is empirically verifiable. That which can not be proved by experience is neither true nor false, meaningless, is not scientific. His criterion of demarcation was based on falsifiability. This states that continuously check a theory does not serve to prove its validity because there may be an object that has not been subjected to analysis and to disprove that theory.