Since the SRO in the building was created to regulate, ie, the formalization of rules for building business and establishing accountability for their failure to perform, creating the SRO is used as called branch principle, which is defined by one activity = one branch of one type of SRO. In fact, the shop is a historic SRO principle objective need and to avoid conflict of interest within the SRO in the building. It is hard to imagine what kind of education, consisting of stakeholders representing various professions and activities that can take any effective rules for one of these activities and then monitor their execution quality actors. However, the creation of SRO with the sectoral principle does not limit any form intersectoral action, such as the participation of representatives of other professions in the work of SRO in the building. Continued use of the terms in the article and view of the profession due to the fact that establishment of SROs in the building can function effectively only in regulated markets. In particular, it is therefore no need to create, for example, the independent directors of SROs or professional investors, not defined as the subject of regulation, ie, profession or activity. If we take into account that the regulation is subject to risk management (risk packages) for each sphere of activity, the specific role begins to play an obligatory feature of SRO in the building, as the use of mechanisms of material responsibility.
It can be assumed that the forms of private regulation to ensure financial Liability SRO will be more effective than regulation officer, are not responsible for their decisions. It is the existence of liability (the formation of compensation funds or property mutual insurance companies is the expense of the SRO participants in the building) to create an effective system of market surveillance. It is assumed that the SROs will monitor compliance with compliance with the requirements of not only legal acts but also its own rules and standards. Definition of requirements in the construction of SRO as additional to the requirements established by federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation, does not mean overregulation participants within SRO and market acceptance of additional obligations in order to create goodwill, and eliminates gaps and develop regulatory control as it is. It should be noted that the implementation of SRO functions of the arbitrator is not qualified by her. Despite the fact that the arbitration function is very important and useful, the establishment of arbitration courts in the CPO does not affect the specificity or the very SRO or arbitration procedures. At the same time, the law imposes on the SRO in the construction of the duty create bodies who apply disciplinary action to the members of SROs in the construction of a violation of the rules and standards. Such a punitive function is required for greater accountability of members of SRO in building and contributes to a collective brand.