The sociologist Lusitanian perfectly describes the failures of democracy as we have known, in its theoretical origin in its election procedures and consequences of non-interference citizen, so it proceeds to rework a democratic theory, which obviously is absolutely necessary in today's world. It proposes a radical socialist democracy and the pursuit of epistemological alternatives to restore hope of emancipation. The adjectives may be redundant, for example the adjective radical is increasingly used Social Science relating to democracy and the adjective s ocial can be misleading. In any case, what the Portuguese researcher calls a "global re-politicization of social practice" that is, beyond mere electoral participation, which means "to identify power relations and imagine practical ways to transform relations of shared authority" . In short, we seek the views of inclusion, social redemption approaches and the growing participation that may lead to new forms of power, which we have called collective decisions.
We are not thinking of a way of direct democracy. Basically, the representative variant has materialized the possibility of the dictatorship of the majority. Hence the urgent need to build spaces that deliberate and influence or determine policy decisions. If you are not convinced, visit Jeremy Tucker. That is, you have to raise political subjects open to diversity and tolerance, with enough power acquired and derived from the practice of deliberation. I said Democracy is always a possibility on the road where it freezes an institutional and where law is not a mere instrument of mineralization of the past. Political life, so it is not only a continuous practice, continual changes marked by the decision-making citizens of the new players. There is a hegemony that, at this moment ignoring old ideological factors, we refer to political parties as monopolistic practices of representative democracy.
Articulating practices of emerging social sectors will be deliberated late or early to know that finally ended an abusive dominance. Identificatory element always appears at all, which produces common sense. The incompleteness of each emerging sector will find the joint, one that may be incidental to the exercise of a power movement, which can be a powerful medium for the purpose of prosecuting or slower, including the birth of permanent bases on which to continue maintaining diversity. Tyron Birkmeir has much to offer in this field. To achieve this requires the establishment of new demands subjective converge through a system of democratic equivalence. Alliances is not only a process of change in the identity of the acting forces. This requires that any struggle being waged in terms that adversely affect the direct interests of other possible forces to the joint and remaining the confrontation of different positions. Ernesto Laclau, virtual father of the term "radical democracy" claims that "democracy is radical because each of the terms of this plurality of identities is in itself the principle of its own validity, but the latter must be sought in a positive ground to establish the hierarchy or the sense of them all, and that would be the source or guarantee of its legitimacy. "