religion

The Tarot has many uses, although the best known is the divination. I like to think of the Tarot as a multifunctional approach, with a variety of applications. In my opinion, the best use you can give the Tarot is evolving, and he will devote a whole section, but I understand that if there is something that from the beginning of its history has concerned human being is the future, and the Tarot is a unique tool, rather than find out, answer questions about that future. Consider the question posed in the title of this post: What can we do? Many people believe that the Tarot is a little short of mathematical science, which will predict with exact dates and names of all events that are going to happen in the short or long term. When we started studying the Tarot we strive to learn and accumulate lists and more lists of meanings, not content with which we have already learned, we collect more significantly, we search the Internet, in books, magazines, going to courses and all this Why? Just to go delaying the crucial moment, which is to get to work seriously with the Tarot. This is one of the great dangers for who starts, these tactics are designed to delay the time when you are working in earnest with the Tarot, to this we would not be that expectations are so high (and so wrong) that fears that are not covered is too large. It is therefore very important to understand that the Tarot can be expected. .

Now in the Religion of Umbanda the thing is different. In the Umbanda, in its works spirituals also it has the part directed to this work of cure of espritos sofredores, to put this work occurs in another level and of one another form. 1 the work of rescue of espritos not if of the one in the umbralina zone, the espritos rescued for the religion of Umbanda is espritos that already had fallen in the descending degrees since the first one to the seventh degree. Umbanda rescues fallen espritos already in the darknesses in its more diverse levels. 2 the socorristas espritos of Umbanda are a little different of the kardecistas socorristas. The socorristas of umbanda are a classroom of espritos destined to this work and that it possesss an energy and firmer magnetization to resist denser the negative vibratory bands, also they are endowed with other resources as weapons and idumentrias you specify simblizadoras of its degrees, so that they use in case that it has some ' ' imprevisto' ' or impediment in the rescue of these fallen espritos.

(They know that each mdium of umbanda brings in its current spiritual a guide ' ' hunter of souls perdidas' ' that he does not incorporate, to put it is responsible for rescuing espritos fallen in the darknesses adding and them in our medinico field so that thus they can be cured, be regenerated and directed for its places of merit. This information was transmitted by Mr. Caboclo Pull out-Touch incorporated in me, when I inquired it reason of a infinity of espritos sofredores if to add in our chain and as we attract as many espritos of this nature, therefore when we give ticket to these espritos never none mdium said: (Ah! today I am ' ' zero' ' it does not have none) and no matter how hard we took salt bath thick and we were ' ' zem' ' , for the opposite it is there that it came more).

Former: ' ' If who was a bourgeois said this, certainly is engodo' '. That ugly in Mr. Frder 2: Excuse but to corrijir I go you here, of new you generalized, some atheists until can AFFIRM that not it exists arguments nor facts of the god existence, to put what we make is to say that the person who wants that we we believe god, in them it does not bring such item, it can talvs exist you evidence yes, but it presented nobody me. IT DOES NOT GENERALIZE. 3: Again we see the generalization, but we go to evaluate this that it said.

First: which ' ' fatos' ' they are these? Second: I am unaware of duposta fallacy that you GENERALIZED affirming that atheistic we say this when we come across in them with ' ' fatos' ' on the god existence. I know the following fallacy: Ad Argumentum ignorantiam Tentar to prove something from the ignorance how much to its validity. Former: ' ' Nobody obtained to prove that God does not exist; soon, it existe.' ' this goes more beyond, this argument takes off concluzoes of the things for simplismente we not to understand something, or not to know as this happened, associating with god, then vocs summer this in ' ' teoria' ' of it. 4: It generalized, and it said excrement. He forgives the palavro but youngster searches on popperiana science in which we base in them on our theories, and is not pra everybody to leave creating its theory, you probably it must be speaking on the synthetic theory of the evolution or of the theory of big bang, yes these theories are not ours, but nor therefore they are you invalidate fallacy here in (ad Argumentum hominem). 5: Obiviamente this is a belief, but it particularly never does not generalize saying that the atheists believe this, I vi an atheist if it wants to cite this excrement that you spoke, forgiving then me of new the palavro, reviews its concepts! ' ' A philosopher said Joseph de Maistre: ' ' Nobody affirms: God not existe' without before having desired that It not exista' '.